wrathofgnon:
“ Traditional Architecture
Built using natural sustainable materials sourced by the owner builder himself and have been in use for centuries or millennia. Firmly rooted in local identity and perfectly adapted to local cultural,...

wrathofgnon:

Traditional Architecture
Built using natural sustainable materials sourced by the owner builder himself and have been in use for centuries or millennia. Firmly rooted in local identity and perfectly adapted to local cultural, environmental, and economic needs, often in villages promoting natural healthy relationships and community. These buildings will never look out of place and will return to nature in years.

Neoclassical Architecture
Built using natural sustainable materials often sourced in the local community, enhances civic pride, rule of law, gentility and civilization harkening back to the loftiest ideas of our common heritage. Built to last for generations, taking pride in fostering men and women useful to their chosen community and national and local heritage. These buildings educate and inspire and slowly turn into nontoxic beautiful ruins.

Modernist Architecture
Built using non-local materials sourced from factories around the globe, disrespecting craftsmanship, local heritage and community by elevating wasteful pride and individualism to a tasteless ideal. Uninformed buyers compete to outbuild each other in often pristine locations thus spoiling it for the locals whose right to land and access stretches back generations. When eventually abandoned: toxic eyesores.

(via tomasnau)

mr-morden-speaks:

desuflamemaster:

brontozaurus:

Today in Australian politics, Abbott referred to Canada as Canadia.

In a press conference.

In Canada.

Canadia sounds 10 times better than Canada though.

But if we’re going to play that game, here is a video our current President of the United States, the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, mispronouncing “corpsman”.

Americania?

I often say Canadia just for the fun of it.

(via mr-morden-speaks)

Brilliant.

Brilliant.

dunsanian:
“ During the past couple of decades, the SPLC has taken in hundreds of millions in donations by raising false alarms about imminent threats of mass violence from “racist” white terrorists. Meanwhile, Hollywood and television churn out show...

dunsanian:

During the past couple of decades, the SPLC has taken in hundreds of millions in donations by raising false alarms about imminent threats of mass violence from “racist” white terrorists. Meanwhile, Hollywood and television churn out show after show depicting “racist” white people committing terrorist attacks.

The United States National Counterterrorism Center statistics prove the SPLC is wrong and that white racial terrorism is a complete fantasy of Hollywood and professional left-wing fund-raising hustles.

According to USNCC records, only four people have died in terrorist attacks categorized as ”Neo-Nazi/Fascist/White Supremacist” since 2001. When you look at the actual incidents, one of the murders was committed by the Turkish “Grey Wolves.” This is a Turkish nationalist group that hates White people. The center classified them as “Fascist.”

So the center lists four deaths and one was not even committed by a “white” person! Two of the other three occurred in Russia and one occurred in Washington DC.

You will note that the center lists almost 16,000 people killed in terrorist attacks by political groups.

So while “racist” whites killed 3 people, radical leftists and communists killed thousands. Muslim terrorists killed tens of thousands. In fact even “Jewish extremists” killed twice as many people as “racist” whites when there are only 15 million Jews in the entire world.

Looking at the total attacks from “Neo-Nazi/Fascist/White Supremacists” (which could, I suppose, be called “White extremists”), the number is 6. If there are, say, one billion White people in the world, that is a rate 6 per billion.

“Jewish extremists,” on the other hand, committed 52 attacks in the same period of time. If there are 15 million Jews worldwide (.015 billion), then the Jewish rate of extremist attacks is 52 times the inverse of .015, or 52 times 67, which comes to 3,467 per billion.

Thus the Jewish rate of extremist attacks is 578 times the White rate. This figure speaks for itself.

(via armedrebellion-deactivated20151)

logicd:

hollsternator23:

I was just struck with the realization that feminism means that I can suck dick if I want to suck dick for the simple fact that I enjoy sucking dick, without having to feel ashamed for sucking dick.

tackling the tough important issues. so empowering. down with the patriarchy. etc

so do you spit or swallow?

I think you already know the answer to that question. logicd

(via logicd)

ethically-wrong:

newsaxonvlad:

Soviet Sweden? Model Nation Sliding to Third World

STOCKHOLM, Sweden — When President Barack Obama visited Sweden last year, he expressed his deep admiration for the Swedish model. But that should make Americans a little nervous.

One U.N. report says Sweden will be a third-world nation in about 15 years, below Libya and Bulgaria. Sweden is a society that believes it is racing into the future, but critics warn that it is racing to the bottom.

It has been a laboratory for all kinds of social experiments: Swedish leaders are trying to build the perfect society.

The country has been compared to two nations that also tried to build perfect societies: North Korea and the Soviet Union.

In Sweden, if you don’t like how utopia is being built, you won’t be shot like in North Korea, but your life could become very unpleasant, very quickly.

A Perfect Society?

A YouTube video shows a journalist from one of Sweden’s leading tabloids, Expressen, confronting a Swede at his home.

The man, a professor, made what he thought were anonymous negative comments on a website about immigrant problems in Sweden.

But left-wing hackers helped the newspaper track him and others like him down so they could be exposed before the whole nation as racists. Another man, a manager, was fired because of it.

Sweden’s leftist establishment and media believe a cornerstone of their perfect society is multiculturalism: large scale immigration from some of the poorest, most backward nations on earth. Swedes who disagree with that plan risk being labeled racist, fascist, even Nazi.

“Immigration is the starting point and the finishing point. It’s the most important point to prove you’re friendly toward foreigners, you’re friendly toward immigration,” Danish journalist Mikael Jalving, author of the book Absolut Sweden, said.

“It’s all about whether you can be said to be hostile to immigration. Once that is ‘proven,’ you’re out of the game. Once you’re ‘proven’ to be a racist or fascist or nationalist, which is almost as bad, you cannot have any legitimate positions or points of view,” he explained.

It doesn’t matter if Sweden’s immigration model is failing miserably, if test scores in Swedish schools are plummeting, or if crime in some areas has skyrocketed. Immigrants burned the Stockholm suburb of Husby for over a week last year.

Many Jews now live in fear of attacks by Muslim immigrants and are leaving.

Amun Abdullahi, a journalist for Swedish radio, left last year and returned to her native Somalia after she was attacked in the Swedish media over her news report about radical Muslim immigrants in Sweden.

She told Swedish television that Mogadishu was safer than then immigrant areas in Stockholm.

Stalinist-Style Sweden

And forget about an American-style “melting pot” in which immigrants will someday learn to become Swedish. In Sweden, that’s a racist idea, too.

Jalving said Swedes are supposed to learn from immigrants, not the other way around. There is a demonstrated hatred of Swedish culture among the nation’s elite.

“Assimilation is completely out of the question,” Jalving told CBN News. “All mainstream political parties would laugh [at the word ‘assimilation’]. [To them] the word ‘assimilation’ is a Nazi word.”

CBN News talked to several journalists who described a Stalinist-style atmosphere in which Sweden’s citizens are now afraid of saying anything that might get them labeled in the media as “racist.”

“If they point at you and say you are a racist, then you will have no job, no career, you might lose your family. You will have no future,” Swedish journalist Ingrid Carlqvist said.

Carlqvist and Danish journalist Lars Hedegaard run the online newspaper Dispatch International, which covers issues like immigration that the mainstream media in Sweden ignore.

But Carlqvist admits their plan for a traditional newspaper failed because Swedes were too scared to have the paper delivered to their homes.

“Because what if the mailman saw if you had this newspaper, or your neighbor saw it? Then they might think that you are racist or that you hate Muslims,” Carlqvist said.

“We thought we could make an impact. We still think we can make an impact, but it’s tough going,” Hedegaard said.

Dispatch International had to drop online subscriptions, too, after repeated hacker attacks because Swedes were again afraid of being exposed. The website now hangs on through donations.

A Third World Country?

Sweden has become a nation where some viewpoints are simply too risky to even read.

“What some Swedish parents advise their children nowadays is to not to interfere in the public discussion, not to express so-called ‘radical’ ideas about this or that that is critical of the consensus in Sweden,” Jalving said. “It’ll harm them in one way or another. The Swedes want to protect their children.”

“That is a very bad situation because you then live in a country where you cannot solve any problems. You do not even know what the problems are,” Hedegaard said.

Hedegaard, a Dane, was nearly killed last year in Copenhagen by an immigrant who came to his door and fired a gun at him.

Carlqvist, a Swede, has decided to leave Sweden because of the persecution of those who dissent.

Sweden is not going to become a third world nation tomorrow. But according to one report, one day it will.

“We had a perfectly good country,” Carlqvist said. “A rich country, a nice country, and in a few years’ time, that country will be gone.”

http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2014/April/Soviet-Sweden-Model-Nation-Sliding-to-Third-World/

In short, lay down and die already.

(via ethically-wrong-deactivated2014)

preppynationalist-deactivated20 asked: can I be your son

Right now I’m on a wait list for a little negro baby from Africa. (I’m right behind Madonna and Sandra Bullock.) If that doesn’t work out, I’ll consider it.

The more things change…

“The Franchise in the South,” by Alfred Moore Waddell

From “Race Problems of the South: Report of the Proceedings of the First Annual Conference Held Under the Auspices of the Southern Society for the Promotion of the Study of Race Conditions and Problems in the South, at Montgomery, Alabama, May 8, 9, 10, AD 1900,” pp. 41-43.

Mr. Lincoln, Morton, Wade, Winter, Davis and their school, were opposed to [Negro suffrage] and did not wish to make it an element in the “reconstruction” of the Southern States. Thaddeus Stevens and his allies, who finally prevailed, openly proclaimed that their chief purpose in demanding Negro suffrage in the South was to permanently secure the ascendency of their party. But there was another and meaner motive for it, which candid Northern men now freely admit. Among other evidences of this fact coming from sources that ought to be credited, I cite the testimony of a Northern man living in my own State, who recently, in an article advocating the pending amendment to the Constitution of North Carolina, limiting the franchise, used the following language in regard to the investment of the Negro with the right of suffrage:

“This we may well be sure was done as a punishment upon the South by a victorious, overbearing North, desirous of humiliating and destroying, in a measure, the self-respect and liberty of their defeated opponents. Of this I am personally cognizant from my then position as an editorial correspondent of a Northern political paper.”

If this be true, as we know it to be, if this cruel thing, done while the passions of the war were still prevailing, was done not from any sense of right and justice to the Negro, or of belief in his capacity for the intelligent exercise of the suffrage, but as a punishment upon the Southern people for the falsely alleged crime of treason and rebellion more than thirty years ago, what justification can possibly be found for a longer continuance of the punishment, in view of the changes that have since occurred in the history of the country? With a patience little less than miraculous, and a fortitude unparalleled, and a fidelity to their obligations unsurpassed, the Southern people have emerged from the jungle of horrors into which this act drove them with hearts still united, with spirits still unbent, with the light of triumph in their faces and the goal of wealth and power in full view.

Whether their Northern countrymen are willing to leave this blot upon the Constitution or not is a question for themselves, but it is, and, if it remain there, will continue to be a vain memorial of their own shame. Unrestricted Negro suffrage in the South is ended, as it ought to be.

And now let us give some of the reasons why it ought to be—reasons drawn not from passion or prejudice—but from facts and bitter experience.

Unrestricted Negro suffrage in the Southern States, if the right be fully and freely exercised, means the most ignorant, corrupt, and evil government ever known in a free country. It means more than this, for there can be no social security where it prevails. Amongst white men, political party ascendency is never utilized to affect the social order. Social disorder invariably follows Negro political ascendency. The Negro has had nearly forty years of freedom and citizenship and opportunity for education, and yet, with many honorable exceptions, he is quite as incapable of understanding the meaning of true liberty and of intelligently exercising political rights as he was when first emancipated. The Southern people, amidst all the calamities that have befallen them, have expended about $100,000,000 for the education of the Negroes since the year 1870, and yet with every succeeding year they have become, as a race, less fitted for the duties of citizenship, and more and more a menace to civilization and good government. These are not wild or exaggerated statements, but facts capable of proof. Taking the allegation in regard to the Negro’s incapacity for an intelligent exercise of his rights and duties as a citizen, and making due allowance for his earlier inexperience and liability to be misled, it is still true that his whole political action, from his enfranchisement to this hour, has been exclusively racial and antagonistic to the best interests of the community in which he lives. The ballot in his hands has been rather a badge of servitude than a credential of citizenship, and the success of the ticket for which he votes is regarded by him as ample authority for aggressiveness and insolence toward his political adversaries. I speak that I do know, and testify that I have seen. He drew the color line himself from the start, and has stupidly stood upon it ever since. In the language of the Northern writer whom I have already quoted, freedom to the Negro means “simply that he may go and come as he pleases, and cast his vote for some question, of the purposes and merits of which he has no more comprehension than the bob-tailed dog who goes with him to the voting place.”

If this were all, though a travesty upon popular government, it might be borne; but, as has happened in every Southern State where the Negroes equal, or outnumber, the white men and where they have voted their full strength, a victory at the polls by their party has invariably been followed by an exhibition of aggressive race feeling and conduct on their part, which endangers the public peace. Then the welfare of society demands that some restriction be placed upon their exercise of the voting power.

That such results have followed the triumph of the Negroes in elections in my own State, [North Carolina], is a matter of public history. In no State in the Union were elections more fairly conducted than there, and in none were the Negroes more kindly and considerately treated, but that very fact nearly caused our ruin. The Negroes, voting as they always have done, as a unit, under the guidance of unprincipled white demagogues, through disaffection and division among the white people, carried the elections in 1896, and immediately in the eastern part of the State, where they predominate, the evidences of race antagonism and a disposition to offensively assert equality began to exhibit themselves. Nothing of the kind had occurred, except in individual instances, since the days of “reconstruction,” but it at once became common and grew apace. Demands for office, which their allies dared not refuse, were made and yielded to, and these demands increased until in some localities the administration of public affairs was largely committed to Negro officials, and white office holders who were, in many instances, more inefficient, ignorant and corrupt than their Negro colleagues. Crimes of all sorts increased alarmingly, and went unpunished. Negro jurors, who sat in every case that was tried, refused, in the face of the most overwhelming and undisputed evidence to convict Negro criminals guilty of outrageous offences. The city authorities and police of some places, including the city in which I live, became a laughing stock to law-breakers, and objects of contempt to all good citizens. Eastern North Carolina became a Negro paradise, and immigration to it began from all quarters. Idle and drunken Negroes infested the streets of Wilmington day and night, and grew more and more insolent and aggressive. Ladies were frequently and grossly insulted and citizens assaulted and robbed in broad daylight. Burglaries were of almost nightly occurrence, and no arrest followed. A Negro newspaper was established, and crowned a series of offensive articles by an attack upon the virtue of white women in general.

Another election was pending and threats of a demand for a still larger share of offices were made. That election was one of the quietest ever held in the State, and the Negroes polled about ninety per cent of their strength, but a large proportion of their former white allies deserted them because of their conduct and their party was beaten. Then, and not until then, the white people asserted their supremacy in an unmistakable way, and they intend to preserve it at all hazards forever. It was not the work of ignorant enemies of the Negroes, but the long delayed, and spontaneous action of all the white people, united for the common purpose of preserving their civilization. Of course there was much misrepresentation of the facts, and much abuse of the leaders of the movement in certain quarters, but it is a sufficient answer to say that no man ever saw all classes of a community, including the clergy, armed and walking guard around their homes when no danger threatened them. In that community to-day there is, as there has been since the tenth of November, 1898, such a transformation as has never occurred in the history of any city in America. Nor is it the peace that reigned in Warsaw that prevails, but a restoration of the majesty of the law under which industrial enterprises have developed as never before, and growth in every direction is manifest, and cheerful confidence has been substituted for paralysis and depression. This remarkable change for the better is observable everywhere in North Carolina where there was Negro political domination.

Anonymous asked: I don't think Collowrath is a troll, and it makes me extremely sad. She's an absolute monster, and yet COMPLETELY confident that her hate and bigotry and delusion doesn't detract from being a decent individual. What seems to be the problem? I'm just racist and awful- but I'm super nice and normal!! Christ. How does that even happen.

collowrath:

omegawizardposting:

It’s just so hard to believe that people like her still exist. American society has made great strides in the past few decades, and seeing people like her…

Well, someday, we won’t. Hopefully, that sort of bigoted thinking will die out soon enough.

This post is such a terrible leftist circlejerk that I don’t even know where to start with correcting it, and somehow I think correcting you isn’t going to do a thing because you’ll still be parroting “Hateful! Bigoted! Deluded! Nazi!“ over and over, despite being completely wrong.

And yeah, I’m really not a troll. A lot of people that I met through this blog know me very well personally, I’m a real person. Shocking, I know.

If I had a daughter and she turned out like one of those two, I’d hold a pillow over her face until she stopped babbling SJW bs. But if collowrath were my daughter, I’d think I was incredibly lucky to have such a great kid.